Charity begins at home — which makes foreign aid more important than ever

first_imgWe should be realistic: aid will always be finite, so let us spend it where it benefits the recipients and the donors alike. Strengthening failed or failing states makes the world safer for us. There is no shame in admitting that, and pursuing it. Aid is in part conflict prevention: let us sing it from the rooftops. We also need to change the kind of aid we give. The story of the fish versus the teaching-to-fish is a chestnut so hoary it requires carbon dating, but it has a kernel of enduring truth. Some 64 per cent of our aid budget goes on bilateral projects (of which, somewhat troublingly given its global stance, Pakistan is by far the largest recipient), and these are often “fish” rather than “fishing lessons”. Many of the countries we help are not short of human capital or entrepreneurial spirit. Opinion Eliot WilsonEliot Wilson is co-founder of Pivot Point and a former House of Commons official. We talk about the influence of soft power and the reputation of the UK abroad resting as an “international development superpower”, but what does it mean in practice? What is the purpose?  But more important than the exact numbers is a rethink of how we give aid. The entire question has become needlessly political, with those on the left guilt-tripping us for not spending more, and voices on the populist right insisting that “charity begins at home” and “India has a space programme, you know”. The Archbishop of Canterbury described the decision as “shameful and wrong” (as a former oil executive he perhaps has some experience of this), while Sir John Major and Tony Blair (their combined tenure as Prime Minister totalling 17 years, during none of which was a statutory target set) have also weighed in. Look at the extraordinary explosion of enterprise in east Africa over the last 10 years, with new businesses springing up in Uganda, Kenya, Botswana and others. What these economies need is access to capital, the wherewithal to fund new technology and infrastructure, and better banking systems. Investment here is potentially transformative: rather than alleviating poverty by giving out aid, we could help resilient populations grow their way out of that poverty, and achieve sustainable growth on their own terms. whatsapp Thursday 26 November 2020 5:35 am No one can have envied Rishi Sunak yesterday, for it was the chancellor’s task to unveil the Spending Review to the House of Commons, facing (we were told by the Treasury) the worst economic landscape since the Great Frost of 1709.  The reality — which may be unpalatable for both camps to acknowledge — is that Britain stands to gain an awful lot from foreign aid, if it is targeted properly. The British have a genius for capital. We were among the pioneers of promissory notes, we created the model for central banking, and we gave birth to some of the greatest joint-stock companies of the mercantile age. Now, with our backs to the economic wall, we need to channel that spirit to the rest of the world.  Britain could help resilient populations grow their way out of that poverty Also Read: Charity begins at home — which makes foreign aid more important than ever whatsapp Sunak strove for sombre and minatory, but he has not yet gained enough political weight for that. Nevertheless, the message was clear. A hard rain’s a-gonna fall. Main image credit: Gettycenter_img Britain could help resilient populations grow their way out of that poverty This was a trophy promise of the Cameron government. It was enshrined in the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act 2015, but that particular piece of legislation has not aged well. Expect an amending bill to hit parliament soon, reducing the figure to 0.5 per cent and saving £4bn in the process. Perhaps it is time for a gust of the fresh air of reality. In 2021, the UK will spend £10bn instead of £14bn on overseas aid, and will fall from the highest to the second highest spender in the G7, slipping behind Germany.  Charity begins at home — which makes foreign aid more important than ever The outcry has come from the development community, of course, and also the political establishment. Liz Sugg, an unobjectionable and worthy Cameroon who found herself a baroness and a minister, has quit her role at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office in protest.  The government talks a great deal of its “levelling-up agenda” between different parts of the United Kingdom: why can’t we set our sights higher, and try to level up the world? City A.M.’s opinion pages are a place for thought-provoking views and debate. These views are not necessarily shared by City A.M. Show Comments ▼ Britain could help resilient populations grow their way out of that poverty Also Read: Charity begins at home — which makes foreign aid more important than ever This is not an abandonment of the “global Britain” tag, and it is hardly a cause for us to hang our heads and rend our clothing. If we are “reduced” to this in the worst economic conditions for 300 years, then perhaps we are doing rather well. More From Our Partners ‘Neighbor from hell’ faces new charges after scaring off home buyersnypost.comAstounding Fossil Discovery in California After Man Looks Closelygoodnewsnetwork.orgFlorida woman allegedly crashes children’s birthday party, rapes teennypost.comA ProPublica investigation has caused outrage in the U.S. this weekvaluewalk.comRussell Wilson, AOC among many voicing support for Naomi Osakacbsnews.comNative American Tribe Gets Back Sacred Island Taken 160 Years Agogoodnewsnetwork.orgMatt Gaetz swindled by ‘malicious actors’ in $155K boat sale boondogglenypost.comPolice Capture Elusive Tiger Poacher After 20 Years of Pursuing the Huntergoodnewsnetwork.orgBrave 7-Year-old Boy Swims an Hour to Rescue His Dad and Little Sistergoodnewsnetwork.orgWhy people are finding dryer sheets in their mailboxesnypost.comSupermodel Anne Vyalitsyna claims income drop, pushes for child supportnypost.comKamala Harris keeps list of reporters who don’t ‘understand’ her: reportnypost.comInside Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis’ not-so-average farmhouse estatenypost.comUK teen died on school trip after teachers allegedly refused her pleasnypost.comI blew off Adam Sandler 22 years ago — and it’s my biggest regretnypost.comConnecticut man dies after crashing Harley into live bearnypost.comBiden received funds from top Russia lobbyist before Nord Stream 2 giveawaynypost.com980-foot skyscraper sways in China, prompting panic and evacuationsnypost.com It must surely be more than pure altruism — important and admirable though that is. If we as a nation are spending tens of billions on something, one does not have to be blinded by realpolitik to expect some return. One of his announcements which caused consternation in the governing classes was the abandonment of the commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of GDP on international aid.  Sharelast_img read more